<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook source leaked &#8211; get it all&#160;here</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:54:28 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scalable web architectures &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Facebook internals</title>
		<link>http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474/comment-page-1#comment-346686</link>
		<dc:creator>Scalable web architectures &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Facebook internals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474#comment-346686</guid>
		<description>[...] go into that in this post, and instead I would like to discus the facebook internals here which alex.moskalyuk touched [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] go into that in this post, and instead I would like to discus the facebook internals here which alex.moskalyuk touched [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474/comment-page-1#comment-346573</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474#comment-346573</guid>
		<description>Hey, Josh,

Oh, yeah, I didn&#039;t read your post as negative at all, sorry that I linked in that context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Josh,</p>
<p>Oh, yeah, I didn&#8217;t read your post as negative at all, sorry that I linked in that context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrasnika&#8217;s Lair &#187; Source Code-а на Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474/comment-page-1#comment-346307</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrasnika&#8217;s Lair &#187; Source Code-а на Facebook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474#comment-346307</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.moskalyuk.com/&#8230;leaked-get-it-all-here/1474 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.moskalyuk.com/&#8230;leaked-get-it-all-here/1474" rel="nofollow">http://www.moskalyuk.com/&#8230;leaked-get-it-all-here/1474</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Young</title>
		<link>http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474/comment-page-1#comment-345573</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474#comment-345573</guid>
		<description>Alex, my quick post wasn&#039;t at all intended to be a negative telling of the story of facebook&#039;s servers&#039; exposing raw code. Quite the opposite, the idea was to reveal that, though the stakes are undeniably high, nothing untoward happened. Sure, my post&#039;s title was meant to be eye-catching, but the point was to mimic the echo chamber--and give it a mild dose of derision. In view of the fact that my post recommends Brandee&#039;s TechCrunch comments, changes the subject only to wish that there were some structural way we could verify it, and then ends with nothing so negative as &quot;So far, so good...,&quot; I hope my other readers don&#039;t take it to be earnestly sensationalist. I regret that I wasn&#039;t clearer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, my quick post wasn&#8217;t at all intended to be a negative telling of the story of facebook&#8217;s servers&#8217; exposing raw code. Quite the opposite, the idea was to reveal that, though the stakes are undeniably high, nothing untoward happened. Sure, my post&#8217;s title was meant to be eye-catching, but the point was to mimic the echo chamber&#8211;and give it a mild dose of derision. In view of the fact that my post recommends Brandee&#8217;s TechCrunch comments, changes the subject only to wish that there were some structural way we could verify it, and then ends with nothing so negative as &#8220;So far, so good&#8230;,&#8221; I hope my other readers don&#8217;t take it to be earnestly sensationalist. I regret that I wasn&#8217;t clearer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
