<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook source leaked - get it all here</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 09:19:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scalable web architectures &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Facebook internals</title>
		<link>http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474#comment-346686</link>
		<dc:creator>Scalable web architectures &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Facebook internals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474#comment-346686</guid>
		<description>[...] go into that in this post, and instead I would like to discus the facebook internals here which alex.moskalyuk touched [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] go into that in this post, and instead I would like to discus the facebook internals here which alex.moskalyuk touched [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474#comment-346573</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474#comment-346573</guid>
		<description>Hey, Josh,

Oh, yeah, I didn't read your post as negative at all, sorry that I linked in that context.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Josh,</p>
<p>Oh, yeah, I didn&#8217;t read your post as negative at all, sorry that I linked in that context.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrasnika&#8217;s Lair &#187; Source Code-а на Facebook</title>
		<link>http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474#comment-346307</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrasnika&#8217;s Lair &#187; Source Code-а на Facebook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 16:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474#comment-346307</guid>
		<description>[...] http://www.moskalyuk.com/&#8230;leaked-get-it-all-here/1474 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://www.moskalyuk.com/&#8230;leaked-get-it-all-here/1474" rel="nofollow">http://www.moskalyuk.com/&#8230;leaked-get-it-all-here/1474</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Young</title>
		<link>http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474#comment-345573</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Aug 2007 08:39:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.moskalyuk.com/blog/facebook-source-leaked-get-it-all-here/1474#comment-345573</guid>
		<description>Alex, my quick post wasn't at all intended to be a negative telling of the story of facebook's servers' exposing raw code. Quite the opposite, the idea was to reveal that, though the stakes are undeniably high, nothing untoward happened. Sure, my post's title was meant to be eye-catching, but the point was to mimic the echo chamber--and give it a mild dose of derision. In view of the fact that my post recommends Brandee's TechCrunch comments, changes the subject only to wish that there were some structural way we could verify it, and then ends with nothing so negative as "So far, so good...," I hope my other readers don't take it to be earnestly sensationalist. I regret that I wasn't clearer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex, my quick post wasn&#8217;t at all intended to be a negative telling of the story of facebook&#8217;s servers&#8217; exposing raw code. Quite the opposite, the idea was to reveal that, though the stakes are undeniably high, nothing untoward happened. Sure, my post&#8217;s title was meant to be eye-catching, but the point was to mimic the echo chamber&#8211;and give it a mild dose of derision. In view of the fact that my post recommends Brandee&#8217;s TechCrunch comments, changes the subject only to wish that there were some structural way we could verify it, and then ends with nothing so negative as &#8220;So far, so good&#8230;,&#8221; I hope my other readers don&#8217;t take it to be earnestly sensationalist. I regret that I wasn&#8217;t clearer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
